BEST PRACTICES TO AVOID FRAUD AND THEFT IN THE MEDICAL OFFICE: HOW TO AVOID EMBEZZLEMENT

AVOIDING EMBEZZLEMENT IN THE MEDICAL PRACTICE 

This is the first in a series of articles on avoiding fraud
and theft in healthcare professionals
offices.  The article is meant for medical
professionals including physicians, dentists, home nursing and mental health
professionals. If you have any questions about this series, feel free to
contact attorney Matthew L. Kinley, a healthcare lawyer in Long Beach,
California at 562.901-3050. 

DEFINING THE PROBLEM
OF FRAUD AND THEFT IN THE HEALTHCARE OFFICE.

          Medical provider offices are subject to fraud and theft as much any business.  According to the Association of Certified
Fraud Examiners
, the amount stolen annually from all U.S. business by employees
exceeds $50 billion.  The Association
claims that as many as 75% of all employees have stolen from their employers.  Most theft is caught by other employees
reporting the theft.  Internal audits catch
a little less than 20% of all theft caught.
Accidental discovery accounts for the same amount of captured theft.

          The
medical practice offers unique opportunities for theft.  Certainly employees steal the usual from
their employers, like supplies and computer parts and money.  Medical practices typically have a large
stream of money.  Employees in the
medical practice also have the opportunity to steal identities of their
employers and patients. There is also the opportunity to steal prescription
pads and controlled substances.

          The
medical facility also has unique risks.
Because of strict regulatory controls, not only does the medical
practice suffer the dollar lost for activities such as theft of co-payments and
identity, there is also the risk of penalties and fines. There is also the risk
of whistle blowers within your own ranks.

          There
are also legal issues associated with confronting the person who is stealing
from your practice.  Should you
electronically monitor employees?  Should you fire an employee?  Should you contact the police?

EMBEZZLEMENT

         This
first article focuses on embezzlement from the medical practice.  Embezzlement from the medical practice can go
unnoticed for several reasons. Often, the embezzler is also the person who
records the receipt of money. Usually it is a trusted employee. Usually, there
is general surprise that the individual caught has committed the crime.

          To
avoid employee theft, the office should have internal controls that immediately
record all transactions.  There should
also be a system of checks and balances to make sure that your employees aren’t
manipulating the system.

 ACTION ITEMS

1. Record all transactions: accounts
payable, accounts receivable, refunds, adjustments, copayments and even write
offs.

2.
Reconcile receivables and charges every day.

3. Issue a receipt with every
transaction; balance receipts every day with a second person verifying the
balance.

4.
Immediately stamp checks “for deposit only.”

5.
Retain charge sheets and explanation of benefit statements to support
daily transactions.

6. Routinely verify petty cash
balances.

7. Periodically hire an accountant to
conduct an audit.

8. Keep duplicates of all deposit
slips.

9. Periodically review all accounting
entries rather than just checking totals.

10. Require signatures from the
appropriate managers for all large checks.

11. Do not allow anyone to sign blank
checks.

11. Cross train employees for all
tasks. 

12. Have an outside book keeper
reconcile bank statements.

13. Have inventory cross checked by
different employees.

14.  Keep
strict controls over business credit cards.
Carefully review all statements.

Article by Matthew L. Kinley, Esq.

DOMA: HOW IT CHANGES BENEFITS FOR SAME SEX COUPLES

THE SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT

The decision of the United States Supreme Court in U.S. v.
Windsor, where the court struck Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act
(DOMA), will change many aspects of healthcare as it relates to same-sex
marriage.  The decision requires that the
federal government recognize same-sex marriages that are recognized under state
law.

SOME OF THE THINGS THE
COURT DID NOT RULE

The Feds Follow the
State
.
The Court didn’t rule that the federal government must recognize all
same-sex marriage.  Instead they
determined that marriage is traditionally an issue for the states to
decide. 

 States Follow Their Own
Path
.  The Court did not
strike down Section 2 of DOMA, which provides that no state shall be required
to recognize a same-sex marriage that is recognized by another state. This
raises a number of issues for couples who move from state to state or who live
in a state that does not recognize same-sex marriage but travel to a state that
does and marry there.

 Retroactive?.  Another open issue is retroactivity. Windsor
did not specifically address whether same-sex couples have any retroactive
rights to any benefits. For example, suppose a 401(k) plan participant entered
into a same-sex marriage, designated someone other than the same-sex spouse as
beneficiary (without obtaining the spouse’s consent), and died before the
decision. Does the surviving spouse have a claim against the plan for survivor
benefits? Do same-sex couples have a right to claim refunds for health plan
benefits that were previously treated as taxable? The Courts and the IRS will
provide guidance on retroactivity at some point. 

CALIFORNIA RECOGNIZES
SAME SEX UNIONS

In California, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision issued on
the same day as U.S. v. Windsor, ruled against the backers of California’s
Proposition 8
gay marriage ban. With the court’s ruling, gay marriage is once
again officially legal in California. While many questions remain about the broader
constitutional issue concerning the right of gay and lesbian couples to get
married, June 26 will be remembered as the day California’s gay marriage ban
died. 

 DOMA:  KNOWN EFFECTS

       1. Imputation of Income.
Same-sex partners will no longer pay federal taxes on income imputed for an
employer
s
contribution to a same-sex spouse
s
medical, dental or vision coverage and employers will no longer be required to
pay federal payroll taxes on such amounts.

        2.     Employer Refunds.  Employers may be entitled to a refund for
payroll taxes previously paid.
Employers may be required to continue to impute income for state law
purposes in states that do not recognize same-sex marriage.

3.  Coverage.
Windsor does not address whether plans that provide spousal coverage must cover
same-sex spouses. Employers with self-insured plans subject to ERISA are not
required to cover spouses and if they do cover some spouses, they are not
necessarily required to cover all spouses. Employers with plans not subject to
ERISA would be subject to any applicable state laws regulating coverage.  The ACA requires coverage of offspring but
not spouses, same sex or not.

 4. Pre-tax premiums.
Employees with same-sex spouses may pay the cost of spousal health coverage by reducing
pay on a pre-tax basis.

 5. COBRA. Same-sex spouses have the same independent COBRA rights as
opposite-sex spouses.

 6.  Special
Enrollment Rights.
Marriage to or divorce from a same-sex spouse is now a
HIPAA special enrollment event under plans offering spousal coverage. Employees
may add a same-sex spouse to their health coverage outside of the open
enrollment period, if they marry or if the spouse loses coverage due to a job
loss or change.

 7.  Personal Representatives.  HIPAA provisions relating to providing
patient information will now clearly include same sex spouses. 

8.  Medical
Expenses Tax Treatment.
Eligible medical expenses incurred by a same-sex
spouse at least since the date of the Windsor decision are eligible for
tax-free reimbursement under health care flexible spending accounts, health
reimbursement arrangements, and health savings accounts. There may also be a
medical expense deduction.  An employee
and a same-sex spouse will share the deduction limit for HSA contributions and
the typical health care cost deduction.

 9.  Qualified Retirement Plans. Spouses have a
number of rights under qualified retirement plans (such as defined benefit and
401(k) plans) subject to ERISA. Some examples of these rights, which must now
be provided to same-sex spouses, include Qualified Joint and Survivor rights,
same-sex spouses who are divorced can obtain a qualified domestic relations
order dividing retirement benefits (QDRO’s), and other rights for spouses.

HEALTHCARE SPECIFIC
ISSUES

Impact on Medicaid/CHIP
Eligibility. 
With
the invalidation of DOMA, states that recognize gay marriage must treat
married, same-sex couples as part of the same household. To determine whether
an individual is eligible for Medicaid/CHIP, states assess a household’s
composition and countable income as a percentage of the federal poverty level.

Treating same-sex couples as spouses can make it more likely that they are eligible
for Medicaid/CHIP by increasing the size of their households or it can make a
household less likely to be eligible by increasing the total family income.
Ultimately, in terms of Medicaid/CHIP eligibility, whether a same-sex couple
benefits or loses from being treated as one household depends on the amount of
income each spouse contributes.

The DOMA decision will affect the access married, same-sex
couples have to many government programs, as well as to employer-sponsored
health insurance. With DOMA no longer in place:

           Same-sex
spouses of federal employees will be entitled to federal healthcare           coverage.

           Same-sex
spouses of military personal will be eligible to receive TRICARE           coverage.

           Individuals in
same-sex marriages
like
those in heterosexual marriages
will
be able to qualify for Medicare based
on a spouse
s
work history.

 OTHER ISSUES

FMLA

The FMLA now will provide entitlement to take leave to care
for a same-sex spouse to the same extent as an opposite-sex spouse.

Medicare Secondary Payer Rules

Same-sex spouses will now be treated as spouses, such that
plans covering spouses of active employees will be considered primary for
Medicare purposes.

Prohibited Transaction Rules

Spouses are treated as “family members” in
determining whether a person is a disqualified person for purposes of
prohibited transaction rules. Same-sex spouses are now disqualified persons to
the same extent that opposite-sex spouses are.

 Ownership Attribution Rules

 The same-sex spouse of a 5% owner of employer stock is now
considered to be a 5% owner by attribution, including for purposes of
identifying highly compensated employees and for top hat purposes.

ACTION
ITEMS

 1.  Begin reimbursing
medical care expenses for same-sex spouses of participants.
Notify employees of the window (typically 30-days) under the
cafeteria plan for family status changes and special enrollment rights for
same-sex spouses and their dependents.

 2. Review definitional and choice-of-law provisions of benefit
plans concerning the definition of “spouse.”  Start obtaining spousal consent from same-sex
spouses for any defined benefit plan retirement distributions.

3. Advise employees married to same-sex spouses to review
their death beneficiary designations; if proper spousal consent has not been
obtained, their designations will be void.

4. Employers will want to ensure that same-sex spouses are
identified for its records in the same manner opposite-sex spouses are
identified. If the employer does not currently distinguish between same-sex
spouses and domestic partners in company records, for example, or identifies
opposite-sex spouses, but not same-sex spouses in its record keeping, the
employer should consider modifying its practices.

5.  Review all plan
documents, in particular the eligibility provisions, to determine if provisions
that were designed to provide coverage to domestic partners or same sex spouses
or designed to restrict coverage to opposite sex spouses should be changed or modified.

6.  Be sure that, at
least after the date of the Windsor decision, retirement plans in operation
provide lawfully married same-sex spouses residing in states where same-sex
marriages are recognized the benefit rights to which opposite sex spouses are
entitled. (See the lists above.)

7.  Cease imputing
income on health coverage and other benefits provided to same-sex spouses
residing in states that recognize same-sex marriage if income imputation is not
required for opposite-sex coverage.

 8. Permit employees to pay the 2013 cost of health care
coverage for lawfully married same-sex spouses residing in states where
same-sex marriages are recognized with pre-tax reductions in pay.

9.Consider whether to seek a refund for employment taxes paid
on imputed income for same-sex spouse benefits for open tax years.

10.  Begin a review of all
employee benefit plans, policies, procedures and handbooks to consider whether
changes are needed or desirable.

Matthew L. Kinley, Esq.

Farmers & Merchants Bank Offers Solutions for Physicians

Farmers & Merchants Bank logo

Did
You Know? — Farmers & Merchants Bank offers a suite of financial services specifically
for practicing physicians. We’ve taken the most important banking products
including credit lines (for medical equipment investment, expansion and more),
merchant services, account analysis, remote deposit capture and business credit
cards, and have bundled them for physicians like you. Add in our exceptional
Concierge Service for a seamless process and you have the F&M Physician
Banking Suite. Now that's a prescription for success. 

Call
Brian Nakamura, F&M Bank’s Physician Banking Suite Representative to get
started today at (714) 472 – 6611 or email him now at
Brian.Nakamura@fmb.com.  Member FDIC.

Support for Compliance with HIPAA

Physicians must comply with HIPAA requriements or face investigations and audits by the Office of Civil Rights or the California Attorney General.  Under California State Law, you also could be sued in a civil lawsuit for a failure to comply.

Tredway, Lumsdaine & Doyle, LLP can support your HIPAA compliance by guiding your organization through the process and providing the forms necessary to be compliant.

The process requires that your institution:

  • Perform an assessment of your current uses and disclosures of patient health information.
  • Perform a “gap analysis” to determine where your current procedures do NOT meet HIPAA standards.
  • Choose methods for getting into compliance.
  • Implement and maintain the required changes.
  • Document your efforts so that, if necessary, you can prove that you are in compliance.

Call Matt Kinley at 562.901.3050 to start the process to comply today.

Matt Kinley, Esq.

Matt Kinley On HIPAA Final Rule: Talk before Orange County Medical Group Management Association

OCMGMA: HIPAA Update

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 (12:00 PM – 1:30 PM)

Presented by: Kathleen Stillwell, MPA/HSA, RN, CPHRM Patient Safety
Risk Management Account Executive, The Doctors Company, and Matthew
Kinley, Esq.,  Partner, Tredway Lumsdaine & Doyle, LLP

Program Information:

The new HIPAA Omnibus Rule
includes new breach notification requirements; limits for use and
disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI), defined Business
Associates and Subcontractors, increased Patient Rights, change in the
Notice of Privacy Practice, increased fines and penalties, and other
important changes. There is a new focus on investigating and penalizing
noncompliance due to “willful neglect.”

The Office of Civil Rights will begin enforcement of the Omnibus Rule September 23, 2013.

Attend this session to learn what actions your practice must take to meet the new federal compliance regulations.

Objectives:

  • Describe new limits on uses and disclosures of PHI
  • Recognize Business Associates and Subcontractors
  • Explain increased Patient Rights
  • Outline action steps for compliance with Omnibus Rule

Kathleen Stillwell Bio       Matt Kinley Bio

RSVP to Maria Taylor at 714-937-2182 or mtaylor@osiortho.com.
Cost: Members – $25, Non-Member managers – $35, Members Vendors and
Vendors who attend the first time – $50. Other Non-Member vendors – $95.

1.0 CEU Available from ACMPE

HOW A PHYSICIAN SHOULD HIRE AN ATTORNEY

One of the most important decisions when facing legal difficulties is hiring a lawyer that will represent the client’s needs.  It’s even more difficult when hiring a lawyer to represent a healthcare professional because of the labyrinth of laws and regulations that affect healthcare.

The lawyer should also be appropriate for your issue.  Medical malpractice lawyers don’t necessarily understand the issues involved in a merger, and a corporate lawyer isn’t ideal in dealing with liabilty issues when faced with a patient claiming malpractice.  A corporate lawyer shouldn’t represent a doctor without specialized knowledge in healthcare law.

Other issues medical professionals should be aware of include:  hourly rates of the lawyers, the approach that the lawyers will take.  Most important, you should have a comfortable relationship with the lawyer and the lawyer’s office and the lawyer should be available to you upon reasonable notice.

This article from the American Medical Association deals with these and other issues for consideration when a doctor hires a lawyer.

http://amednews.com/article/20130610/profession/130619980/4/

 

Submitted by:  Matthew L. Kinley, Esq.

Mr. Kinley Speaks to OCMA regarding HIPAA Updates

HIPAA Update: The Omnibus Rule

Date: 6/4/2013

Time: 6:00 PM – 8:00 PM

Location:
Irvine, CA

Registration Fees:

Synopsis:

EARN 1.5 CME CREDITS
The Doctors
Company is fiercely committed to advancing, protecting, and rewarding
the practice of good medicine. We remain the leader in developing
innovative tools that can help you improve the quality of patient care
and decrease the number of adverse events. We invite you to join us for
our seminar
HIPAA Update: The Omnibus Rule.
 
Target Audience:
Physicians of All Specialties
 
Purpose:
The new
HIPAA Omnibus Rule includes new breach notification requirements; limits
for use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI), defined
Business Associates and Subcontractors, increased Patient Rights, change
in the Notice of Privacy Practice, increased fines and penalties, and
other important changes. There is a new focus on investigating and
penalizing noncompliance due to "willful neglect." The Office of Civil
Rights will begin enforcement of the Omnibus Rule on September 23, 2013.
Attend this session to learn what actions your practice must take to
meet the new federal compliance regulations.
 
Objectives:
At the conclusion of this program, the physician should be able to:
  • Describe new limits on uses and disclosures of PHI
  • Recognize Business Associates and Subcontractors
  • Explain increased Patient Rights
  • Outline action steps for compliance with Omnibus Rule  
  •  
    Presenters:
    Kathleen Stillwell, MPA/HSA, RN, CPHRM, Patient Safety Risk Management Account Executive, The Doctors Company
     
    Matthew Kinley, JD, Partner, Tredway Lumsdaine & Doyle, LLP
     
    Date/Time:
    Tuesday, June 4, 2013
    6:00 PM – Dinner
    6:30 – 8:00 PM – Seminar
     
     
    Location:
    OCMA Conference Center
    17322 Murphy Ave.
    Irvine, CA 92614
     
     
     
    Price:
    OCMA Members and  Non-member physicians: Free
     
     
     
    RSVP:
     
    Questions:
    If
    you have any questions regarding the seminar, contact The Doctors
    Company's Patient Safety Department at (800) 421-2368, extension 1243.
     
     
    The
    Doctors Company is accredited by the Accreditation Council for
    Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to sponsor continuing medical
    education for physicians.
     
    The
    Doctors Company designates this educational activity for a maximum of
    1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit
    commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
     
    The
    Doctors Company wishes to take steps to ensure no individual with a
    disability is discriminated against because of the absence of auxiliary
    aids and services. If special arrangements are required for an
    individual to participate in the program, please contact The Doctors
    Company at least 10 days prior to the scheduled date.
     
     

    View Speakers

    Event Description:
    Attend this session to learn what actions your practice must take to meet the new federal compliance regulations.

    HIPAA: Business Associates and Business Associate Agreements

    Health care
    professionals working with personal medical information face major compliance
    obligations under the newest rules related to “protected health information
    (“PHI”).  The Omnibus rules were issued by the Department of
    Health and Human Services issued last January (the “Final Rule”).

    The Final Rule
    sets requirements and authorizes substantially increased penalties for
    violations of HHS’ regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and
    Accountability Act of 1996
    (HIPAA) and the 2009 Health Information Technology
    for Economic and Clinical Health
    (HITECH) Act. Particularly in light of those
    increased penalties, HIPAA covered entities (health plans, health care
    clearinghouses, and most health care providers) and their “business associates”
    — which are now directly subject to HHS regulations — should be actively
    reviewing their new responsibilities under the Final Rule.

    The Final Rule’s
    significant aspects relating to business associates are:

     

    • Make
      subcontractors (and sub-subcontractors, sub-sub-subcontractors, etc.) of
      HIPAA business associates themselves “business associates” and thus
      directly subject to most provisions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule, as well as
      the HIPAA Security Rule and HHS’ Breach Notification Rule;
    • Eliminate
      the “risk of harm” standard that HHS previously prescribed as a criterion
      for determining when it is necessary to notify individuals about a breach
      of security affecting their PHI; and
    • Require
      amendments to Notices of Privacy Practices, business associate agreements,
      and a variety of policies and procedures entailed in complying with the
      Privacy Rule.

    With limited
    exceptions, compliance with the Final Rule’s provisions is required by
    September 23, 2013.

    The HHS has
    compiled extensive information about the business associates at their WEBSITE .

    The site
    includes a generic, sample agreement for business associates.  The sight
    warns that not all of the sample should be used and parts should be modified to
    set the exact situation. This agreement is a good start for complying with the
    law. 

     By Matthew L. Kinley, Esq

    EMPLOYERS QUESTIONS ANSWERED: PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE INSURANCE

    The United States Congressional Research Service has issued this helpful white paper answering employers questions about the new penalities for failure to provide appropriate insurance.  The paper, called POTENTIAL EMPLOYER PENALITIES UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, does not provide any new information, but it is a good source for those people who want to familiarize themselves with the requirements. 

    Home Healthcare vs. Personal Care: When is a license required?

    When does
    an organization that provides home services such as companionship or personal
    care
    need a state license? What is the difference between home health care
    services and other care provided to seniors or medically challenged
    individuals?

    In
    California, there is no clear answer. 
    Under Health and Safety Code section 1475(b), "All organizations
    that provide skilled nursing services to patients in the home shall obtain a
    home health agency license issued by the department." Skilled nursing is
    defined as services provided by a registered nurse or licensed vocational
    nurse
    . (Health and Safety Code section 1427(b).   A "home health agency" includes
    "a private or public organization, including, but not limited to, any partnership,
    corporation, political subdivision of the state, or other government agency
    within the state, which provides, or arranges for the provision of, skilled
    nursing services, to persons in their temporary or permanent place of
    residence."  Under this statute,
    activities that require medical or professional judgment require a license.

    There are
    thousands of companies that are providing "personal care." This is
    care provided to people who may need help with their day to day activities,
    including bathing, shopping, cooking and cleaning.  These individuals who have no training and
    they do not have any experience or education in health care related tasks.  They likewise have no bonds which could be utilized to pay in the event of some sort of damage or abuse, such as financial elder abuse.  As long as they avoid medically intensive
    activities, they do not require a license.

     

    However,
    organizations without licenses cannot, 
    under Health and Safety Code section 1476:

     

    "(1)
    Represent itself to be a home health agency by its name or advertisement,
    soliciting, or any other presentments to the public, or in the context of
    services within the scope of this chapter imply that it is licensed to provide
    those services or to make any reference to employee bonding in relation to
    those services.

     

    (2) Use
    the words
    home health agency, home health, home-health, home health, or in-home health, or any combination of those terms, within its name.

     

    (3) Use
    the words
    skilled or nursing, or any combination of those terms within its name, to
    imply that it is licensed as a home health agency to provide those
    services."

     

    Non-licensed
    persons can help with
    prescribed drugs.

    Some
    interpretations of the Controlled Substances Act permits a companion to handle
    a drug prescribed for his or her employer in ways which are consistent with the
    prescription short of actual administration of the drug and which do not
    constitute the practice of medicine or nursing. 

     A
    question arises as to what is meant by "administering the drug."   This again is a gray area.  In a telephone conversation with the
    Department of Healthcare, I was told that in investigations about licensure
    requirements, the state investigators often will look at the condition of the patient.  Is the patient directing the unlicensed care
    provider?  Could the patient administer
    the drugs themselves?  Is the patient
    providing direction to the care provider? 
    If the patient is unable to direct such care, it is likely the care
    requires a license.

     A home
    care companion may administer non-prescription drugs to his or her employer in
    the employer
    s home under the domestic
    administration of family remedies, but this only extends only to the
    administration of nonprescription drugs in
    the domestic environment. It does not authorize a companion to participate, by
    advice or otherwise, in the diagnosis or decisions regarding the drug to use or
    its dosage made by the employer or his or her physician. Nor does it authorize
    the companion to administer controlled substances of any kind.

    The same
    questions arise with home based equipment, including oxygen, sleep apnea
    machines,  dialysis machines, catheters
    of various kinds, and gastrostomy feeding, among many others.  This provides a scenario for disaster for the
    non-licensed care provider and the patients they serve.

    Take for
    example, gastrostomy feeding.  In such
    cases, a surgical opening into the stomach is made which allows a tube to be
    inserted in the stomach through the abdominal and stomach walls. This allows
    food and fluid to be instilled directly into the stomach from outside the body
    when swallowing is impossible because of complete obstruction of the esophagus.
    It is also sometimes used temporarily after operations on the esophagus or for
    postoperative decompression in preference to nasogastric intubation. During
    gastrostomy feeding the patient must be upright lest the danger of aspiration
    or regurgitation occur. Precaution is required in handling the gastrostomy tube
    which has been either fastened in place with sutures or has been anchored in
    place with tape depending on the type of gastrostomy tube used, a
    small-diameter rubber, perforated tube or a Foley catheter.

     With the
    gastrostomy feeding itself, one first instills a clear liquid to make sure the
    tube is open and, again, feeding is gentle using gravity or slow infusion. At
    all times the tube must be kept open, because should it become clogged or
    blocked, or accidentally removed, further intervention will be necessary to
    replace it. The task of feeding is not in itself particularly difficult, but it
    does require a studied knowledge and understanding of the principles involved,
    an ability to recognize signs of potential complication, and an appreciation
    for the potential for yet another intervention on the weakened patient.

    Reviewing
    the requirements for such care, the California Attorney General advised that
    such conduct requires "substantial scientific knowledge and technical
    skill."  Even though many people
    complete such procedures at home, home care providers are not allowed under the
    law to provide such service without a license. 
    As stated by the Attorney General, "We are bolstered in this
    assessment by title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, section 409.33(b)
    governing Medicare eligibility for payments for skilled nursing services
    listing
    Levin tube and gastrostomy
    feedings
    as services which qualify as
    skilled nursing services. Stedman
    s Medical Dictionary, 5th ed.,
    defines Levin tube as a tube introduced through the nose into the upper
    alimentary canal.  Accordingly these
    procedures come within the statutory definition of the practice of nursing and
    therefore may only be performed in California by licensed nurses and
    practitioners."

     

    The
    California Legislature is currently reviewing bills to license home care
    providers who do work other than healthcare. This article in California Healthline details some of the most recent efforts.

     Such
    proposed regulations could serve to clarify when a license is required, but
    will certainly drive up the cost of such care, making it out of reach for many
    of our seniors and medically challenged.   Questions about whether a license is required should be directed a lawyer with knowledge of these regulations.